Outsourced fiber door-to-door sales vendors compared (2026)

By Miles Winger, Co-Founder & CEO, Velocity One · Published 2026-09-01 · Updated 2026-09-08

If you are a fiber provider choosing a door-to-door vendor, the questions that matter are the same for every company: what is the model, what triggers payment, who employs the reps, which providers have they actually sold for, and what results do they publish with definitions. This page puts five vendors, including us, on one table. Where a vendor does not publish an answer, the cell says so. We are Velocity One, so treat this as a structured starting point and verify everything with each vendor.

The roundup

VendorModelFiber-specific?Names fiber providers publicly?Publishes fiber results?HQ
Velocity OneManaged D2D dealer: blitz launch, then sustained local team. Per-order fee, no retainer. 1099 reps.YesYes (7 providers)Yes, with a public methodologyVineyard, UT
RCLXBuilds, trains, and manages D2D teams; per completed installYesYes (T-Mobile fiber)Illustrative dashboard onlyNot published
Omni Pulse LLCCommission-only 1099 bench, paid per activationYesYes (4 carriers)NoNot published
Home Front SolutionsField sales plus Dooriax marketing and CRM; commercial terms set per engagementFiber and other categoriesNo named fiber-client roster disclosed in its comparisonNo approved public fiber case study or campaign totals disclosed in its comparisonHigh Point, NC
Firstline Fiber"ISP growth partner": recruits, trains, manages D2D repsYesNoNoCache County, UT

The comparisons

How we compared

We first reviewed these vendors on September 1, 2026 and refreshed Home Front's entry on September 8, 2026. We recorded what each site says about eight things: the model, the pricing basis, workforce classification, which providers it names, which states it works in, what results it publishes, what tooling it uses, and what third-party records exist. We did not use sales calls, private proposals, or anything a vendor told us in confidence. If a vendor's site does not answer a question, the table says "Not published" rather than guessing. Vendors with older, larger, or more national operations than ours are described that way; we are a 2026 company and the comparisons say so.

What we did not compare: price levels. No vendor in the set publishes a fee, and neither do we, because the fee depends on the offer, the footprint density, and the deployment type. What we can tell you is the basis: we charge a per-order dealer fee on orders that complete, with no retainer, and every fee ties to an account in your own system.

Sources and disclosure

Velocity One wrote this page. We compete with every company on it. Competitor facts come only from each company's own public website, with review dates and sources for each listed at the bottom of its comparison page. Velocity One figures come from our operations database and are defined on the methodology page. If you represent one of these companies and something here is wrong or out of date, email miles@v1g.io and we will correct it.

Compare us on your footprint

Send us the serviceability file and the offer. We will come back with a launch plan, a per-order fee, and the numbers we would expect, with definitions.

Request a Partnership Call